Welfare and Social Responsibility :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Welfare and Social Responsibility Welfare. Read that word to yourself and ask what popular images surround it. The starting signal thing is probably women and pip-squeakren. This one is correct, because 97% of AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children, the federal welfare program) is made up of women and children. Young women? Not really-the average age of a perplex receiving welfare is 29, and only 7.6% are under the age of 20. Is she black? Maybe, because the composition of the welfare roles is about the same percentage black and white. More kids than she can guess? The average welfare family has 2.9 members. That means a single mom would have 1.9 children (fewer than the national average). Forever dependent?-the average length of a stay on welfare is 22 months. We certainly think that they dont work. Without bringing up the question of why raising children is not considered work, the average AFDC benefit plus food stamps liquid is only 69% of the poverty line. Women on w elfare are constantly working to make up that difference. Do we think of welfare as pricey? AFDC represents just over 1% of the national budget. If welfare is not about young women having lots of babies and living their life off the generosity of the state, and if its a belittled part of the federal budget, why have Republicans chosen it as their pilot issue? Why, when our Federal Reserve is raising interest prises and attempting to maintain an unemployment rate of 6.2%, and when a job at minimum wage would still leave a mother with two children 23% below the poverty line, is entrance into the gainful workforce being pushed as the panacea for poverty? If we are serious about getting people to work we need relevant training programs, child care provisions, and efforts at job creation. These at least were discussed in the Clinton plan, if the plan was in many other ways as punitive and insubstantial as the Republican plan. The Republican ideology is particularly insidious because it shifts the entire frame of debate from the structural to the moral. It implies, even states, that if those people would just clean up their morals and stop being so lazy that they could have a place in the American Dream. Today welfare moms are understood to be the image for all that is morally wrong with America.